The National Security Agency routinely shares raw
intelligence data with Israel without first sifting it to remove information
about US citizens, a top-secret document provided to the Guardian by
whistleblower Edward Snowden reveals.
The British newspaper said details of the
intelligence-sharing agreement are laid out in a memorandum of understanding
between the NSA and its Israeli counterpart that shows the US government handed
over intercepted communications likely to contain phone calls and emails of
American citizens. The agreement places no legally binding limits on the use of
the data by the Israelis.
According to the report, the disclosure that the NSA agreed
to provide raw intelligence data to a foreign country contrasts with assurances
from the Obama administration that there are rigorous safeguards to protect the
privacy of US citizens caught in the dragnet. The intelligence community calls
this process "minimization", but the memorandum makes clear that the
information shared with the Israelis would be in its pre-minimized state.
The deal was reached in principle in March 2009, according
to the undated memorandum, which lays out the ground rules for the intelligence
sharing.
The five-page memorandum, termed an agreement between the US
and Israeli intelligence agencies "pertaining to the protection of US
persons," repeatedly stresses the constitutional rights of Americans to
privacy and the need for Israeli intelligence staff to respect these rights,
the Guardian reported.
But this is undermined by the disclosure that Israel is
allowed to receive "raw Sigint" – signal intelligence. The memorandum
says: "Raw Sigint includes, but is not limited to, unevaluated and
unminimized transcripts, gists, facsimiles, telex, voice and Digital Network
Intelligence metadata and content."
According to the agreement, the intelligence being shared
would not be filtered in advance by NSA analysts to remove US communications.
"NSA routinely sends ISNU (the Israeli Sigint National Unit - aka 8200)
minimized and unminimized raw collection", it says.
The Guardian stressed that although the memorandum is
explicit in saying the material had to be handled in accordance with US law,
and that the Israelis agreed not to deliberately target Americans identified in
the data, these rules are not backed up by legal obligations.
"This agreement is not intended to create any legally
enforceable rights and shall not be construed to be either an international
agreement or a legally binding instrument according to international law,"
the document says.
In a statement to the Guardian, an NSA spokesperson did not
deny that personal data about Americans was included in raw intelligence data
shared with the Israelis. But the agency insisted that the shared intelligence
complied with all rules governing privacy.
"Any US person information that is acquired as a result
of NSA's surveillance activities is handled under procedures that are designed
to protect privacy rights," the spokesperson told the British newspaper.
The memorandum of understanding, which the Guardian is
publishing in full, allows Israel to retain "any files containing the
identities of US persons" for up to a year. The agreement requests only
that the Israelis should consult the NSA's special liaison adviser when such
data is found.
'Trust issues'
Notably, a much stricter rule was set for US government
communications found in the raw intelligence.
The Israelis were required to "destroy upon
recognition" any communication "that is either to or from an official
of the US government."
Such communications included those of "officials of the
executive branch (including the White House, cabinet departments, and
independent agencies), the US House of Representatives and Senate (member and
staff) and the US federal court system (including, but not limited to, the
supreme court)."
The document mentions only one check carried out by the NSA
on the raw intelligence, saying the agency will "regularly review a sample
of files transferred to ISNU to validate the absence of US persons'
identities". It also requests that the Israelis limit access only to
personnel with a "strict need to know."
Israeli intelligence is allowed "to disseminate foreign
intelligence information concerning US persons derived from raw Sigint by
NSA" on condition that it does so "in a manner that does not identify
the US person."
The agreement also allows Israel to release US person
identities to "outside parties, including all INSU customers" with
the NSA's written permission.
The Guardian said that although Israel is one of America's
closest allies, it is not one of the inner core of countries involved in
surveillance sharing with the US - Britain, Australia, Canada and New Zealand.
This group is collectively known as Five Eyes.
While NSA documents tout the mutually beneficial
relationship of Sigint sharing, another report, marked top secret and dated
September 2007, states that the relationship, while central to US strategy, has
become overwhelmingly one-sided in favor of Israel.
"Balancing the Sigint exchange equally between US and
Israeli needs has been a constant challenge," states the report, titled
'History of the US – Israel Sigint Relationship, Post-1992'. "In the last
decade, it arguably tilted heavily in favor of Israeli security concerns. 9/11
came, and went, with NSA's only true Third Party (counter-terrorism)
relationship being driven almost totally by the needs of the partner."
In another top-secret document seen by the Guardian, dated
2008, a senior NSA official points out that Israel aggressively spies on the US.
"On the one hand, the Israelis are extraordinarily good Sigint partners
for us, but on the other, they target us to learn our positions on Middle East
problems," the official says. "A NIE (National Intelligence Estimate)
ranked them as the third most aggressive intelligence service against the
US."
Later in the document, the official is quoted as saying:
"One of NSA's biggest threats is actually from friendly intelligence
services, like Israel. There are parameters on what NSA shares with them, but
the exchange is so robust, we sometimes share more than we intended."
According to the Guardian's report, the memorandum of
understanding also contains hints that there had been tensions in the
intelligence-sharing relationship with Israel. At a meeting in March 2009
between the two agencies, according to the document, it was agreed that the
sharing of raw data required a new framework and further training for Israeli
personnel to protect US person information.
It is not clear whether or not this was because there had
been problems up to that point in the handling of intelligence that was found
to contain Americans' data.
However, an earlier US document obtained by Snowden, which
discusses co-operating on a military intelligence program, bluntly lists under
the cons: "Trust issues which revolve around previous ISR (Israel)
operations."
No comments:
Post a Comment