Four years after the incident was first reported, a court
has decided to sentence the 'starving mother' to a one-year period of probation.
Jerusalem District Court's ruling was made according to the
original arrangement with the defendant, and in opposition to prosecution's
request to sentence the mother to jail time for violating the pre-agreed
settlement terms.
Four and a half years ago, the Orthodox mother was accused
of disconnecting her child's feeding tubes.
In 2010, she signed a plea bargain, admitting that she used
to starve her child and agreeing to be subject to monitoring and treatments.
At the end of her three-year house arrest, the mother was
supposed to enter a two-year probation period, and in exchange, the prosecution
would sentence her to a conditional prison term.
Five months ago, the Attorney General claimed that the
mother is in breach of their agreement and is not receiving the proper
treatment.
In response, Judge Amnon Cohen called to conduct another
several-month-long examination.
At the deliberation regarding her sentence, held some three
weeks ago, the prosecution repeated their pleas, asking for a one-year jail sentence,
but their request was denied.
"Despite the severity of the crimes for which she was
convicted, it seems to me that when considering the amount of time passed and
the changing of circumstances, and especially in light of the defendant's
deteriorating medical condition, in addition to being a mother of eight
children, with the youngest aged only five, it would not be right to impose an
imprisonment sentence on the defendant," Cohen claimed.
In addition, the fact that welfare authorities have agreed
to return the children to her custody after reaching the conclusion that she
does not pose a risk to their safety speaks for itself."
The mother rejoiced at the Court's decision and after the
deliberation, said that it served as a testimony to those who nicknamed her the
'starving mother'.
"Now I ask the State to leave me in peace and to let me
run my household," she added.
The mother's attorneys, Yehuda Fried and Tal Gabay,
applauded the Court's decision and said that "it makes no sense to impose a
prison sentence on such a woman. The fact that her children are being properly
treated, as all accounts show, and have been in her custody for the past two
and a half year, serves as the best proof.
"Her debt to society has been paid, in every imaginable
aspect."
No comments:
Post a Comment