The final, haunting photo of Princess Diana, taken on the
night she died, shows her sitting with her boyfriend Dodi Fayed in the back of
a Mercedes car as it roars away from the rear entrance of the Paris Ritz Hotel,
heading for the couple’s secret love-nest near the Champs-Elysees.
Diana is twisting her head to peer out of the Mercedes’ rear
window, anxiously looking to see if her car is being chased by the paparazzi
who had besieged her and Dodi since their arrival in the French capital from a
Mediterranean holiday eight hours earlier.
At the wheel is chauffeur Henri Paul. Dodi’s bodyguard
Trevor Rees-Jones is in the front passenger seat.
What happened over the next two minutes is central to a new
probe by Scotland Yard into an astonishing claim from an SAS sniper, known as Soldier
N, that members of his elite regiment assassinated Diana seconds after the
Mercedes sped at 63mph into the notoriously dangerous Pont d’Alma road tunnel.
Many will dismiss Soldier N’s claims as yet another
conspiracy theory. After all, millions of words have been written about Diana’s
death at 12.20am on Sunday, August 31, 1997.
Two inquiries, by Scotland Yard and the French police, have
found the deaths were a tragic accident.
An official inquest, which ended five years ago, came to the
same conclusion.
The world was led to believe the blame lay with the grossly
negligent driving of an intoxicated Mr Paul and the pursuing paparazzi.
But — however unlikely they may seem at first glance — I am
convinced there is something in Soldier N’s claims.
Ever since Diana’s death at the age of 36, I have
investigated forensically the events that led up to the crash and what happened
afterwards.
I have spoken to eye-witnesses, French and British
intelligence officers, SAS soldiers and to friends of Diana and Dodi. And I
have interviewed the Brittany-based parents of the 41-year-old chauffeur Henri
Paul.
They told me, with tears in their eyes, that their son was not a heavy
drinker: his chosen potion was a bottle of beer or the occasional Ricard, a
liquorice-flavoured aperitif.
The fact is that too many of these accounts suggest that
Diana’s death was no accident.
Crucially, my investigations show that the paparazzi who
supposedly hounded Diana to her death were not even in the Pont d’Alma tunnel
at the time of the car crash.
They also reveal how a high-powered black motorbike — which
did not belong to any of the paparazzi — shot past Diana’s Mercedes in the
tunnel.
Eyewitnesses say its rider and pillion passenger
deliberately caused the car to crash.
In addition, my inquiries unearthed the existence of a
shadowy SAS unit that answers to MI6, as well as the names of two MI6 officers
who were linked by a number of sources to Diana’s death.
Could the Establishment really have turned Henri Paul and
the paparazzi into scapegoats? Could there have been a skilful cover-up by
people in powerful places to hide exactly what did happen?
There is little doubt that Diana, recently divorced from
Prince Charles, was a thorn in the side of the Royal Family. Her romance with
Dodi, though only six weeks old, was serious.
The Princess had given her lover her ‘most precious
possession’ — a pair of her deceased father’s cufflinks — and phoned friends,
saying she had a ‘big surprise’ for them when she returned from Paris.
Read more: Dailymail